The ICAS Lectures
2010-1019-JHH
Republic of Korea’s Foreign Policy toward Major Powers and North
Korea
Jin Ha Hwang
|
ICAS Fall Symposium
Humanity, Peace and Security
The Korean Peninsula Issues
October 19, 2010 Tuesday 1:30 PM - 5:00 PM
Rayburn Office Building Room B 318
United States House of Representatives
Capitol Hill, Washington, DC 20515
Institute for Corean-American Studies, Inc.
965 Clover Court, Blue Bell, PA 19422
Email: icas@icasinc.org
http://www.icasinc.org
Biographic sketch & Links: Jin Ha Hwang
Republic of Korea’s Foreign Policy
toward Major Powers and North
Korea
Assemblyman Jin Ha Hwang
ICAS Fellow
Member, the ROK National Assembly
I sincerely appreciate your invitation to a meaningful seminar. I also give my
whole-hearted thanks to Synja P Kim, the President of ICAS and Sang Joo Kim,
the Executive Vice President of ICAS for successfully hosting today’s event.
And thanks for your warm welcome.
My name is Jin Ha HWANG, a member of Korean National Assembly. I am
currently representing a city of Paju in Gyeonggi Province, where the symbol of
Korean Division—Pan Mun Jom—is located. At National Assembly, I am
serving at Foreign Affairs Committee.
This year marks the 60th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean
War. From this respect, organizing today’s ICAS symposium to promote
understanding about Korea’s foreign policy is a meaningful opportunity for all
of us. As one humble Korean, I would like to offer my deepest appreciation to
sacrifice of 1 million 900 thousand veterans from 21 United Nations (UN)
member states during the Korean War, particularly the United States leading
UN forces at the time. Without this international assistance, Korea could not
have avoided the danger of national collapse. Thank you.
I would like to take today’s opportunity to share my personal thoughts about the
Republic of Korea’s foreign policy toward the United States, China, Japan, and
North Korea. Korea has experienced and overcome a number of difficult
challenges caused by its geopolitical situation which has made it vulnerable to
power struggles among neighboring powers in the past.
President Lee, Myung-Bak announced a Global Korea Vision in his inaugural
address in 2008. The founding principle of Korea is rooted in "Hongik
Ingan." "Hongik Ingan" means "benefiting humankind
far and wide." I believe that the spirit of President Lee’s desire toward
Global Korea stems from "Hongik Ingan." Thus, the Global Korea
Vision is based on respect for global standards and values and Korea’s strong
will to make a greater contribution to spread these values across the world.
This spirit has existed with the history of Korea for five thousand years and is
regarded as the best value among Koreans. Two years have passed since
President Lee’s declaration of the Global Korea Vision. Currently, the
Republic of Korea makes its utmost efforts to create "a Global
Miracle" in the 21st century, beyond its "Han-River
Miracle" in the 20th century. And, I am confident that these
efforts will be kept in following Korean administrations.
To better understand Korea’s foreign policy, I would like to introduce a few
variables that must be considered while implementing Korea’s foreign
policy.
First, the geopolitical situation of the Korean Peninsula is a very unique.
The Korean Peninsula is surrounded by such great powers as the United States,
China, Japan, and Russia. A similar geographic condition is not to be found in
any place in the world. This condition is our unchangeable strategic
environment and fate. Korea has overcome an unforgettable history of more
than 930 invasions. I am sure that no other country in the world has such a
heartrending history of more than 930 outside attacks. More remarkable are
the economic and political developments Korea made after overcoming a
number of outside attacks. The geographic location of the Korean Peninsula
and political competition among great powers has greatly affected Korea’s
foreign policy, national interests, and national fate. Simply looking at the
history of the 20th century, the Japanese colonial rule and The Korean
War are apparent examples.
Second, the Korean Peninsula is the only remnant of the Cold War.
The division of the Korean Peninsula and North Korea’s continuous threats is a
core cause of the so-called "Korea Discount" underestimating the
national value of Korea. The current division between the two Koreas is a
historical challenge to be resolved for the sake of the two Koreas’ development,
regional stability and prosperity, and further international peace. I must stress
that international consensus and effort is the key to address threats posed by
North Korea, including its nuclear weapon program, North Korea’s all-out crisis
caused by its deteriorating economic condition, increasing political instability,
and uncertain power succession process. The international community must
work together to create political rehabilitation between the two Koreas, which
would finally lay the political and economic ground required for achieving a
peaceful unification. The Republic of Korea currently places its policy priority
on replacing the "Korea Discount" with a "Korea
Premium" by managing a successful armistice condition with strong
cooperation with the international community, which we hope will encourage
North Korea to change and stop its menacing behaviors.
Third, Korea plays a leading role in the peace and prosperity of the
world for the first time during its history of five thousand years. This global
effort and vision reflects Korea’s strong will of returning favors offered by the
international community beyond increasing Korea’s national interests and
influence. Korea’s role and responsibility is now expanding into a global
context beyond Asia. All Koreans are well aware that Korea would not be
what it is without international assistance during the Korean War and its post-
war reconstruction. For this reason, the ROK government pledges to become a
responsible member of the international community through continuing and
increasing its global contribution.
The ROK government is actively engaged in UN peacekeeping operations,
continuing economic assistance to underdeveloped and undeveloped countries,
and increasing the size of its official development assistance (ODA). For
example, the ROK government first joined a UN-led peacekeeping operation in
1993. Since 1993, the government contributed a total of more than 8,000 UN
PKO troops. Also, Korea launched its Official Development Assistance
(ODA) program in 1987 to assist economic development of underdeveloped and
undeveloped nations. Starting from 23 million US dollars in 1987, Korea's
ODA budget in 2009 was 815 million US dollars. Over the next five years,
Korea plans to increase the budget of ODA to 2.5% of Gross National Income
(GNI). As of now, around 1,800 Korean volunteers, called "World
Friends Korea," are currently working against poverty and sharing Korea’s
know-how of economic development in 45 countries.
Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen,
The ROK-US alliance has been a strong and firm buttress for the Republic of
Korea to thrive and to dynamically transform into a global nation. The scope
and scale of the alliance, begun as a military alliance, has extended to include a
comprehensive and strategic global context. For more than half a century, the
ROK-US alliance has played a successful role for the peace and prosperity of
the Asia region, becoming the most successful bilateral alliance.
The bilateral relationship is built on mutual respect of values and trust,
maintaining a far more solid partnership than ever before. Now, the two
nations are deepening and broadening a strategic alliance structure. Two
leaders of the Republic of Korea and the United States officially signed a
"Joint Vision" at the summit talks in June 2009. Through this
historical opportunity, the two governments advanced common efforts in a
concrete way to realize an agreed joint vision. The current process is to
readjust the ROK-US alliance into a future-oriented alliance in order to work
together to address global issues, beyond dealing only with bilateral issues as in
the past. I believe that all of you vividly remember North Korea's unprovoked
attack on Korea’s naval ship on March 26th. In the wake of North
Korea's surprise attack, resolute political decisions and a strong partnership
allowed the Republic of Korea and the United States to jointly condemn North
Korea’s attack and deter further provocations. I think that these diplomatic
efforts were very successful. And, additional efforts, such as joint military
exercises, are still ongoing. At the same time, the Republic of Korea and the
United States continue their efforts through international persuasion and
sanctions to create positive changes for resolving North Korea's nuclear
issue. Beyond it, the two nations lead international support in addressing non-
military issues like human rights and economic poverty.
In addition to dealing with the traditional bilateral agenda, the two nations now
strengthen their policy cooperation and coordination in working on global issues
such as the current global economic crisis and "a world without nuclear
weapons." I am sure that the G-20 Summit in November in Seoul will
provide an invaluable opportunity for the Republic of Korea to share
experiences of overcoming global financial crisis among participating countries
and accordingly to discuss a path toward global co-prosperity. Also, the
2nd Nuclear Security Summit in 2012, Seoul, will be a meaningful
momentum for enhancing Korea's contribution to global peace and
security.
The bilateral effort to transform the ROK-US alliance into a global strategic
partnership is a crucial variable to consider in US strategy for Asia. Korea is
no longer a marginal state located in the shadow of China, Japan, and Russia,
but a key state with China, Japan, and Russia. I am strongly confident that the
ROK-US alliance has been the linchpin for meeting US demands in the region,
now becoming not "a choice but a requirement" for protecting US
national interests in the region. The Korea-US Free Trade Agreement
(KORUS FTA) agreed in 2007 is a prominent example for this changing status
of the ROK-US alliance. The KORUS FTA aims to promote the mutual
economic interests of the two parties and will become a strategic catalyst for
upgrading the alliance. The KORUS FTA is not yet ratified in congress in both
nations. But, President Lee and President Obama share a strong and common
understanding of the strategic importance of the KORUS FTA, and on the
sidelines of the G20 Summit in June instructed the conclusion of working-level
discussions over the FTA before November’s G20 Summit in Seoul.
Ladies and gentlemen, this successful development of the ROK-US alliance is a
monumental achievement built on the foundation of the blood alliance. In this
aspect, the ROK-US alliance is our pride and proud legacy, and what we have to
sustain and develop for the future. During more than half a century, the two
nations have made bold decisions and overcome challenging issues facing
us. By the same token, we must explore what to address, develop, and
accordingly take required steps for building a future-oriented global
alliance. This is a future challenge before us.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The rise of China is a key factor to the security and peace of Northeast Asia and
shaping international order toward promoting global security and peace as
well. President Obama has stated, "the relationship between the United
States and China will be one of the most important bilateral relationships and
shape the nature of international politics of the 21st
century." In the G-20 Summit in April 2009, President Obama and
President Hu agreed to build positive, cooperative, and comprehensive
relationship for the 21st century. The relationship between Korea
and China is a key foreign agenda to Korea like the ROK-US
alliance.
During a visit to China in 2008, President Lee and President Hu agreed to
change the bilateral relationship from a "comprehensive and cooperative
partnership" to "strategic and cooperative
partnership." Recently, the two nations attempted to increase mutual
cooperation in addressing bilateral and global issues as well. At the summit in
October 2009, the two leaders signed the "Korea-China Vision Report for
Economic and Trade Cooperation." Bilateral economic and trade
cooperation is expected to increase more and more. This report envisions the
achievement of 200 billion US dollars of total trade at the earliest possible time
and the goal of reaching 300 billion US dollars by 2015. Now, China is the
ROK’s largest trading partner. In 2009, bilateral trade reached 141 billion U.S.
dollars. In addition to economic exchange, people-to-people and cultural
exchanges have rapidly increased.
China is a key nation who is able to play a leading and responsible role for
resolving North Korea’s nuclear problem toward the peace and security of the
Korean Peninsula. At this time, the international community demands that
China play these roles. And yet, because of China’s traditional blood alliance
with North Korea, China maintains an ambiguous stance in responding to
international demands when dealing with North Korean issues, and sometimes
ignores international demands. I think that China did not fully comply with its
stated foreign policy guideline of pursuing "independent, autonomous, and
peaceful foreign policy toward international peace, development, and
cooperation" when dealing with North Korea’s unprovoked attack on
Korea's naval ship. According to its strategic assumption that continuing
international discussion over North Korea’s attack might lead to additional
international sanctions on and diplomatic conflict with North Korea which
would make it harder to resolve North Korea’s nuclear issue, China strongly
expressed its intention to work together for resuming the Six-party talks rather
than continuing diplomatic debate over North Korea’s attack. Contrary to
China's hope, the international stance for resuming the Six-party talks is firm
and unshakable; North Korea should first implement its responsibilities before
the resumption of the talks.
The ROK government adheres to the following policy guidelines for fully
committing to cooperative strategic partnership between the Republic of Korea
and China.
First, the ROK government continues to expand the mutual relationship
in the area of people-to-people and cultural exchanges. The Korean Wave
(Hallyu), growing popularity of Korean culture and goods, has already hit the
mainland of China extensively. For example, the size of student exchanges
between Korea and China is the largest portion of foreign students in each
nation. In 2009, the total number of visitors between the two nations reached
4.5 million. And, among the annual 90 thousand applicants for the Chinese
Language Fluency Test in the world, Koreans are about 60 thousand, 60% of
total applicants. I think that improved mutual cooperation will contribute to
decreasing public negative sentiments about each other, and make a greater
opportunity to develop a bilateral partnership.
Second, the ROK government will work together with the Chinese
government in a way that the rise and change of China will contribute to
regional and international peace and prosperity. China currently implements its
active engagement policy in addressing global issues and promoting
relationships with individual nations in a global context beyond Asia. And yet,
there remains uncertainty about Chinese strategy, and thus expectation and
concern about a growing Chinese power coexist. China, along with the United
States, is likely to lead international order in the 21st
century. Under this condition, the ROK government is willing to go forward
with China in addressing global issues for promoting Chinese cooperative and
constructive relationships with the United States and the international
community as well.
Third, the ROK government continues working with China to induce
positive changes from North Korea which will finally lead to peace and
prosperity on the Korean Peninsula. China has maintained a unique and
special relationship with North Korea which other countries are not able to
have. China is the largest trading partner with North Korea and also North
Korea’s biggest foreign investor. In 2009, it was estimated that North Korea's
dependence on China is about 70% of its total foreign trade. The size of trade
between the two nations continuously grows, reaching 2.7 billion US dollars in
2009. China annually provides the value of 3 to 4 hundred million US dollars
in grants to North Korea. In 2010, North Korea signed an MOU with China to
construct a new bridge across the Yalu River and to lease North Korea’s Najin
Port to China for 10 years in order to attract foreign investment while
overcoming a domestic economic crisis.
In conclusion, the ROK government is willing to continue its effort to fully
commit to strategic cooperative partnership between Korea and China. In
addition, we strongly hope that a rising and changing China will play a
responsible role in leading international order with the United States in the
21st century. Regarding the condition of the Korean Peninsula,
the ROK government works together with China in that China plays an active
role in resolving North Korea's comprehensive issues including the nuclear
problem and accordingly removing the remnants of the Cold War on the Korean
Peninsula.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Koreans view Korea and Japan as "close but distant countries."
This illustration reflects the diversities of historical relationship between the two
nations. There are diverse discussions over the nature of the two nations’
relationship in both Korea and Japan. For example, Koreans still express their
resentment over Japanese colonial rule, the claim of Japanese sovereignty over
Dokdo Island, and Japanese distortions of historical facts. Despite this
historical discord, the two nations are developing their mutual relationship in
areas of politics, security, economy, and culture.
In September 2009, the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) won parliamentary
election and took power from the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which ruled
the Japanese government for the past 54 years. After this election, the ROK
government and the Japanese government redefined the relationship of the two
governments as "close and close countries." Japanese Prime
Minister Kan Naoto said in a statement issued on August 10th,
"I would like to face history with sincerity." And further, he stated,
"I would like to have courage to squarely confront the facts of history and
humility to accept them, as well as to be honest to reflect upon the errors of our
own." He acknowledged the suffering caused by Japan’s colonial rule
and apologized to Koreans, and also declared his intention to return Korean
cultural artifacts taken by Japan during the colonial period. The ROK
government requested that Prime Minister Kan’s statement be fully
implemented, which will make a new opportunity to upgrade the relationship
between the two nations.
The ROK government continues the following efforts for the development of a
future-oriented relationship with Japan.
First, the ROK government works to promote mutual cooperation between the
Republic of Korea, Japan, and China for building a future-oriented regional
order in Northeast Asia. Japan is Korea’s second largest trading partner. In
2009, the total value of trade between the two nations reached 71.2 billion US
dollars. The population in the three nations is about 23% of the world’s
population. And, in terms of trade volume, the total trade volume of the three
nations is about 16% of the world’s trade volume. These statistics reflect that
Northeast Asia is becoming a key region in the world, and interdependence
among the three nations is becoming deeper and broader. The leaders of the
three nations have held summit talks every year since 2008. The third trilateral
summit talks in 2010 presented and adopted "VISION 2020" calling
for future cooperation and exchanges for the next 10 years.
Second, the ROK government strongly insists that the Japanese
government should not be willing to domestically politicize historical discords
with Korea, but rather should strengthen friendship with Korea. Distortion of
historical facts in textbooks and the Defense White Paper would be likely to
prompt anti-Japanese sentiment in the region, which is not favorable for the
Japanese government in promoting its international role or achieving its national
interests. Among many potential reasons, the frequent changes of governments
brought about diverse interpretations about historical facts. Over the past 20
years, 14 Prime Ministers have held office. The ROK government continues
cooperation with Japan to encourage the Japanese government to expand and
deepen its friendship with regional countries rather than facing political discord
with them because of different perceptions of historical facts.
Third, in addition to building a trilateral partnership between Korea,
Japan, and China, the ROK government intends to increase its international
contribution by working with Japan. Korea and Japan employ very similar
policy options such as joining peacekeeping operations, providing official
development assistance, and operating international cooperation agencies:
Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA) in Korea and Japan
International Cooperation Agency (JICA) in Japan. If Korea and Japan build
solid cooperation rather than competition under a common goal of increasing
international contributions, there would be a greater opportunity to increase our
contribution to the international community.
Currently, Korea and Japan make their utmost effort to realize a future
partnership. Beyond building a bilateral relationship, we are required to
discuss and develop a win-win strategy for strengthening mutual cooperation in
addressing regional and global issues at the same time. Last year, the United
States and Japan experienced unexpected political tension over relocating US
military bases. At the time, some people said that this condition would be a
good opportunity for the ROK-US alliance. But, I did not think so. The
change of ruling party in Japan could not reverse agreement between former
Japanese and US governments because the US-Japan alliance has matured on
the basis of long-term political trust. The ROK government plays an
increasingly important role in promoting the relationship between Korea, Japan,
and China, between Korea, the United States, and Japan, and between the
United States, Japan, and China.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
For the past half a century, the Korean War remains under a condition of
armistice. The division between the two Koreas has not been reunified. North
Korea still poses diverse threats beyond its traditional military threats.
Threats posed by North Korea to the outside world are severe. At the same
time, domestic crises in North Korea are far more considerable. For example,
political instability caused by the unstable process of power succession, chronic
economic deterioration, and continuing defection of North Koreans to other
countries escalate domestic tensions. In the Workers' Party Representative
Meeting of September 28th, convened for the first time after a
lapse of 44 years, Kim Jong-Un was promoted to a four-star general and
appointed to relatively high positions within the Workers' Party, a Vice
Chairman of the Central Military Commission and a Member of the Central
Committee. These facts reinforce speculation that Kim Jong-Un is designated
to succeed Kim Jong-Il. When Kim Jong-Un takes power depends on Kim
Jong-Il’s health condition. I think that North Korea's power succession will
speed up from now on. One of our biggest concerns is how North Korea will
change its policy after a power succession.
North Korea’s message to the international community is very regretful after the
Workers' Party Representative meeting. On September 29th, Park Kil-Yon,
Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,
stated at the 65th Session of United Nations General Assembly
that " as long as the US nuclear aircraft carriers sail around the seas of our
country, our nuclear deterrent can never be abandoned, but should be
strengthened further." He added, "the United States is not a defender,
but a disruptor of peace." Also, he emphasized, "the present South
Korean authorities drive the inter-Korean relations into a rupture by bringing
forward the so-called ‘three-phase unification proposal’, which is anti-
reunification and confrontational." Koreans are not seriously concerned
about North Korea’s diplomatic bluff because this rhetoric is just repetition of
past North Korean activities. But, we are concerned about the dark future of
North Korea as it is not willing to work with the international
community.
Through today's opportunity, it is meaningful to remember the policy guidelines
of Korea's policy toward North Korea.
First, the ROK government is always ready to work with North Korea
to support its cooperation with the international community. The international
community does not aim for North Korea's regime collapse or overthrow, but
rather strongly hopes that North Korea will become a responsible member of the
international community. North Korea's severe isolation from the international
society is not a proper choice for either North Korea or the international
community.
Second, the ROK government will implement its economic assistance
package once North Korea makes a positive change of its international behavior
and lead the effort for the international assistance and support required for
overcoming the economic difficulties facing North Korea. North Korea should
recognize that it gives up provocative activities and opens its society to the
world for the survival of its regime. When the two Koreas faced political
deadlock, North Korea made a unilateral decision to limit the access of Koreans
to the Kaesung Industrial Complex, which is an obvious violation of agreement
between the two Koreas. The foremost responsibility of any government is to
protect the safety of its people. In this respect, it was a difficult and bold
decision for the ROK government to implement its responsibility in operating
the complex despite North Korea’s repeated and direct threats to economic
activities within the complex, causing financial damages to Korean
investors. Our genuine and sincere political intent of assisting North Korea
allows the ROK government to continue supporting the Kaesung Industrial
Complex.
Third, the ROK government continues its consistent policy of providing
humanitarian assistance and making a bigger effort toward building a political
reconciliation. But, North Korea does not seem to give up its coercive control
over the distribution of food provided by the international community to North
Koreans. If North Korea insists on maintaining this stance, we cannot rule out
the possibility that North Korea will use food provided by the international
community for its strategic purpose. Under this condition, the ROK
government could not provide large-scale food assistance at a government level,
but only permit a small amount of assistance by civil organizations and aid
groups in Korea. The decision to suspend government food assistance to North
Korea is also part of South Korea's comprehensive measures announced in May
in response to North Korea's unprovoked attack on South Korea's naval ship in
March.
Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen,
I sincerely appreciate your generous invitation to this symposium. It is my
great honor to speak my thoughts about the ROK government’s foreign policies
with major countries.
Today, many people from diverse areas get together here. I would like to
remind all of you that your continuing support for the Republic of Korea is a
cornerstone for what Korea is today.
In a changing world, the current diverse efforts toward Global Korea is intended
to promote Korea's national interests in one respect and return the favor offered
by the international community during a post-war reconstruction which led to
Korea's economic development in the other respect. In addition, I am confident
that the Republic of Korea holds on to a great vision that we will make
strenuous efforts with the United States for the peace and prosperity of the
world.
Thank you for your attention.
Thank you!
This page last updated October 22, 2010 jdb